PDA

View Full Version : SiSoftware Sandra Unbuffered Memory Settings



Mikki
05-24-2003, 05:48 PM
Just thought it would be a good idea to post this, this is one of those things folks ask about all the time....;)

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ad.leach/unbuff.JPG

Here's an updated screenie of Sandra 2005 Lite SR3. Only slightly different, settings are the same.

http://www.bleedinedge.com/images/unbuffered.jpg

ThugsRook
06-03-2003, 12:56 AM
Asus P4G8X
Kingston HyperX 3000 2x512mb Cas22261
179fsb / 358ddr

unbuffered 2437 / 2513
http://home.attbi.com/~d2rook/p4g8x/179-2226ub.gif

:wave:

Hawk
06-03-2003, 03:48 AM
Here is the P4C800 running Dual OCZ 3700 256MB chips @ DDR494 running @ 2-3-3-7 Unbuffered

Radelon
06-05-2003, 01:29 PM
Hawk, I'd be posting some too if I wasn't having some weird issues...... Once it's figured out, I'm sure me and my P4 Mobile Wonder will impress some peeps.

pointreyes
06-10-2003, 02:52 PM
Buffered:
Int Buff iSSE2 4700 MB/s
Float Buff iSSE2 4692 MB/s

Unbuffered:
Int ALU 2836 MB/s
Float FPU 2857 MB/s

Running Windows 2003 Enterprise Server with 50+ processes in the task manager. 2x512Meg of XMS3500C2 at SPD and no oc'ing of any type. Processor is 2.8C. Not so bleedin' edge but believe me, I'm bleedin' from the upgrade. :rolleyes:

I changed the memory to Crucial PC3200 ECC. And the new results with no oc'ing:
Buffered:
Int Buff iSSE2 4657 MB/s - down from Corsair
Float Buff iSSE2 4660 MB/s - down from Corsair

Unbuffered:
Int ALU 2793 MB/s - down from Corsair
Float FPU 2864 MB/s - up from Corsair

No surprises, it's ECC RAM so the results should be a little slower than the Corsair.

BTW: I did try tighter timings and the scores would drop by over 150+. So the best results were with 3-8-3-3 timings. :(

LastRide
06-11-2003, 08:11 PM
Thanks Mikki.I asked about how to run Sandra unbuffered benchmark yesterday.I totally missed this.:blush:

ErikaeanLogic
06-12-2003, 06:11 AM
Originally posted by pointreyes
Not so bleedin' edge but believe me, I'm bleedin' from the upgrade. :rolleyes:


LOL :rotflmao:

ThugsRook
06-21-2003, 11:03 PM
ABIT IC7
Kingston HyperX 3000 2x512mb Cas2226
191fsb / 382ddr

unbuffered 3362 / 3197
http://home.attbi.com/~d2rook/ic7/ss191ub.gif

:wave:

eva2000
06-26-2003, 04:18 PM
2.4C
Albatron PX865PE PRO2 1.02 beta bios
Enhanced Performance disabled
HT Enabled

2x 256MB OCZ PC3700 Gold
250FSB
250MEM 2.5-3-3-7 at 2.85v

http://www.fileshosts.com/pentium4/D1/albatron/benchmarks/oczpc3700gold/1_2/250-250-2.5-3-3-7-hton-ehoff/mem-unbuff-ehoff.jpg

roystarman
06-27-2003, 01:29 AM
Mine were 3007 unbuffered and 5116 buffered

with IC-7G
2 GIG of Corsair 3200LL
2.8G running at 3.015G 1:1 ratio FSB 215:wave:

Dakisha
04-10-2004, 12:28 PM
2x256 OCZ PC4000 copper (dual chan kit)

5787MB/s Int Buffered,
5771MB/s Float Buffered

2627MB/s Int ALU
2746MB/s Float FPU

2.4@3.0, 1:1, 250FSB, 3-4-4-8, HT enabled =)

Dakisha

(Edit: And then I notice this post is months old ;))

Ancient_1
04-13-2004, 01:58 PM
I guess since I am here I can post mine from my IC7 MAX3.

This is just a quicky I did a while ago maybe if I reinstall the ram in here and play with the timings I could do a bit better. This was just a speed detting.
The mem is in my p4c800 d right now and doesnt do as well there.
And the 4200 I have in here dont either.

http://webpages.charter.net/chew_toy/sandra4kub.gif

Killer Munkey
07-01-2004, 07:01 AM
i used the settings at the top and it cut my bandwidth score a lot.

with 2x256mb pc2700 at 2,3,2,7 CMD1 i got
Int ALU: 940
Float FPU: 996

with all the options check i get about 2300-2400 score on both. any reason why disabling the options is good or a better way to mesaure bandwidth?

mysteryman
07-01-2004, 12:56 PM
Wow, do I have the record (at least in this thread!)! Ha!

Here are my scores:

Buffered: 6441 float / 6471 int
Unbuffered: 3481 float / 3329 int


2.4c m0, p4c800-e dlx, pc4200el, 275fsb, 1:1

watch this post get much longer, now that ive created a little competition!

3246251196
07-12-2004, 03:00 PM
hello. i am new here but i was wondering. in a couple of days i am getting 2*512 OCZ 3700EB - is this good memory in your opinions? and what bandwidths do you think it will achieve?

pointreyes
07-12-2004, 03:56 PM
hello. i am new here but i was wondering. in a couple of days i am getting 2*512 OCZ 3700EB - is this good memory in your opinions? and what bandwidths do you think it will achieve?

:welcome: to BE, 3246251196! BTW: BE happens to be the official OCZ place for help. :beer: You might want to check out this section of BE. :)
http://www.bleedinedge.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=54

Jim
07-12-2004, 05:44 PM
3246251196 , welcome to the BE. :welcome:
You should enjoy those sticks. :thumb:
There is a thread on them here (http://www.bleedinedge.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2562) . G/L

pointreyes
07-12-2004, 08:15 PM
Wow, do I have the record (at least in this thread!)! Ha!

Here are my scores:

Buffered: 6441 float / 6471 int
Unbuffered: 3481 float / 3329 int


2.4c m0, p4c800-e dlx, pc4200el, 275fsb, 1:1

watch this post get much longer, now that ive created a little competition!

Not anymore. Considering that I'm using 333fsb procs with 400fsb RAM that cannot be forced to run at 400fsb I think this is pretty good. :)

SiSoftware Sandra

Benchmark Results
RAM Bandwidth Int ALU : 3491MB/s
RAM Bandwidth Float FPU : 3795MB/s

Int ALU (Integer STREAM) Results Breakdown
Assignment : 3310MB/s
Scaling : 3250MB/s
Addition : 3734MB/s
Triad : 3672MB/s
Data Item Size : 4-bytes
Buffering Used : No
Offset Displacement Used : Yes
Bandwidth Efficiency : 27% (estimated)

Float FPU (Float STREAM) Results Breakdown
Assignment : 3655MB/s
Scaling : 3576MB/s
Addition : 4010MB/s
Triad : 3941MB/s
Data Item Size : 8-bytes
Buffering Used : No
Offset Displacement Used : Yes
Bandwidth Efficiency : 30% (estimated)

Performance Test Status
Run ID : <edited out> on Monday, July 12, 2004 at 9:09:04 PM
Memory Used by Test : 512MB
NUMA Support : Yes
Number of NUMA Nodes : 2
SMP Test : Yes
Total Test Threads : 2
SMT Test : No
Dynamic MP/MT Load Balance : No
Processor Affinity : No
Page Size : 4kB
Use Large Memory Pages : No

NUMA Information
Number of NUMA Nodes : 2
Node 0 - Free Memory : 481MB
Node 1 - Free Memory : 757MB

Chipset 1
Model : Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) Athlon 64 / Opteron HyperTransport Technology Configuration
Front Side Bus Speed : 2x 796MHz (1592MHz data rate)
In/Out Width : 16-bit / 16-bit
Maximum Bus Bandwidth : 6368MB/s (estimated)

Logical/Chipset 1 Memory Banks
Bank 0 : 512MB ECC DDR-SDRAM Registered 2.0-3-2-2CL 2CMD
Bank 1 : 512MB ECC DDR-SDRAM Registered 2.0-3-2-2CL 2CMD
Channels : 1
Bank Interleave : 2-way
Speed : 2x 199MHz (398MHz data rate)
Width : 128-bit
Maximum Memory Bus Bandwidth : 6368MB/s (estimated)

Chipset 2
Model : Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) Athlon 64 / Opteron HyperTransport Technology Configuration
Front Side Bus Speed : 2x 796MHz (1592MHz data rate)
In/Out Width : 16-bit / 16-bit
Maximum Bus Bandwidth : 6368MB/s (estimated)

Logical/Chipset 2 Memory Banks
Bank 0 : 512MB ECC DDR-SDRAM Registered 2.0-3-2-2CL 2CMD
Bank 1 : 512MB ECC DDR-SDRAM Registered 2.0-3-2-2CL 2CMD
Channels : 1
Bank Interleave : 2-way
Speed : 2x 199MHz (398MHz data rate)
Width : 128-bit
Maximum Memory Bus Bandwidth : 6368MB/s (estimated)

Chipset 3
Model : Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) AMD-8151 AGP Device (System Controller)
Front Side Bus Speed : 1x 199MHz (199MHz data rate)
In/Out Width : 16-bit / 16-bit
Maximum Bus Bandwidth : 796MB/s (estimated)

Logical/Chipset 3 Memory Banks

Features
MMX Technology : Yes
SSE Technology : Yes
SSE2 Technology : Yes
SSE3 Technology : No
EMMX - Extended MMX Technology : Yes
HTT - Hyper-Threading Technology : No

Spec3
07-13-2004, 10:16 AM
Wow, do I have the record (at least in this thread!)! Ha!

Here are my scores:

Buffered: 6441 float / 6471 int
Unbuffered: 3481 float / 3329 int


2.4c m0, p4c800-e dlx, pc4200el, 275fsb, 1:1

watch this post get much longer, now that ive created a little competition!

You need to read the first post in the thread. This is sandra unbuffered not buffered like your showing. If you want buff I can post a 6975MB/s 292Mhz 1:1 shot :thumb:

Steve

pointreyes
07-13-2004, 11:46 AM
You need to read the first post in the thread. This is sandra unbuffered not buffered like your showing. If you want buff I can post a 6975MB/s 292Mhz 1:1 shot :thumb:

Steve

He has his unbuffered results one line below his buffered results. :)

Spec3
07-14-2004, 04:42 AM
He has his unbuffered results one line below his buffered results. :)


Err doh. Someone shoot me ...I'm still jetlagged :beat:

Nice score then mysteryman

Steve

proFeign
07-18-2004, 11:11 PM
You need to read the first post in the thread. This is sandra unbuffered not buffered like your showing. If you want buff I can post a 6975MB/s 292Mhz 1:1 shot :thumb:

Steve


How do you get unbuffered? Mine will no doubt not be as impressive as most.

I have a RAM timing question:

my settings on a p4c800e deluxe are 250 5:4 2-3-3-5-4

Is it better to have timings match up? Should it be 2-3-3-8-4 or 2-3-3-8-8?

That's two separate questions...

This is only my second post and I'm pretty new to overclocking...

Thanks!

glorfy
02-27-2005, 03:11 AM
Hooray! The attachment is back on the first post! It was missing the other day! Well done whoever!

boshuter
03-10-2005, 03:53 PM
Unbuffered...

http://img163.exs.cx/img163/556/siunbuff6fd.jpg


Buffered...

http://img163.exs.cx/img163/3748/sibuff1ww.jpg

RufusG
09-06-2005, 10:51 AM
If you have a motherboard that supports Intel Dual Channel Memory, read on:

Background

For background information on the Intel Dual Channel Memory Architecture, please see these documents:

Intel Dual Channel DDR Memory Architecture White Paper
http://www.kingston.com/newtech/MKF_520DDRWhitepaper.pdf

Dual Channel DDR400 memory can balance the performance of the Intel Pentium 4 processor with 800MHz front side bus.
http://www.intel.com/design/chipsets/dual_ddr_sb.pdf


Personal Experience

I bought a PC with a single factory-fitted 256MB DIMM.

I installed a matched pair of PC3200/DDR400 DIMMs - in the correct sockets - and measured the following memory performance improvement:

Pentium 4, 3.2GHz
Single DIMM 2947 MBytes / sec
Dual DIMMs 4664 MBytes / sec
( SiSoft SANDRA benchmark )

The Intel and Kingston documents suggest that this results in a 10-25% improvement in overall system performance.

Hope that this helps

Regards

Mikki
04-28-2006, 12:09 PM
Updated main post with screenie of Sandra 2005 Lite SR3....settings are the same, but the box and listings are slightly different....in case anyone cares.....

flexkill
04-28-2006, 01:57 PM
Updated main post with screenie of Sandra 2005 Lite SR3....settings are the same, but the box and listings are slightly different....in case anyone cares.....
:thumbs: :beer:

smithshn
06-07-2010, 11:43 AM
I have read your stuff. It is an interesting and useful for me. I am appreciated for it. I am also glad that you have mention necessary configuration of it. You have nice way to explanation that any person can easily understand about it.

tracyk859
11-09-2010, 06:55 PM
Thanks for the post.
Hi guys, Im a newbie. Nice to join this forum.

RacingKen
12-14-2010, 03:47 PM
does anyone have the best (oc) timings for my (OCZ Reaper HPC Edition Dual Channel 4 GB : 2 x 2 GB Memory - DIMM 240-pin - 1066 MHz ( PC2-8500 )?
I have not oced them in so long I forgot or lost the timings I used before.:chit:

RacingKen
12-19-2010, 05:30 AM
Ok I found them.:chit: