PCmark 04 scores!!! [Archive] - Forums on the BleedinEdge

Snafu

12-08-2004, 12:41 PM

:lol: I DL PCMark04 and tried running it on my system. Found out you need to DL another file (something decoder I think :scratch: ). Just a heads-up for those who DL with modems.

I will edited this post once I check the name at home :thumb: .

EDIT: it is WM Encoder 9 that you need to DL with PCMark04.

malinois1

12-08-2004, 02:43 PM

5485 :)

boshuter

12-08-2004, 07:25 PM

I ran this on the 3.6 lga system and got 6316..... but I noticed something strange. That score was with the video card stock. I overclocked the video card and got a lower score :yikes: So I lowered the oc on the video card and ran it again.... this time it was a little higher, but still lower than with the card at stock :scratch: Has anyone else tried this to see if they get the same results?

jcarno

12-08-2004, 07:45 PM

old score

boshuter

12-08-2004, 08:17 PM

Wrong version jcarno...... have you downloaded the '04 yet? You also have to have at least version 9 of WMP and the WME mentioned above. It will sure tax a video card, I can clock higher in any other benchmark than I can in this one :eek:

Killer Munkey

12-08-2004, 08:33 PM

my score went down 10 points with an OCed vid card, not that much but i thought it'd go up so i'm confused

boshuter

12-08-2004, 08:43 PM

my score went down 10 points with an OCed vid card, not that much but i thought it'd go up so i'm confused

Same here.... the more I oc the video card, the lower the score :coocoo:

jcarno

12-09-2004, 12:59 AM

oh crap........thats not even pc mark!!!!!!!!!! :coocoo:

jcarno

12-09-2004, 01:02 AM

this more like it!!

flexkill

12-09-2004, 01:57 AM

oh crap........thats not even pc mark!!!!!!!!!! :coocoo:

:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :beer:

flexkill

12-09-2004, 04:33 AM

will somone tell me why it keep's saying i have to run test suite to get a score!!!! :irk: ...i am running the damn thing!!! :| :lol: ...help me!!!! :(

Killer Munkey

12-09-2004, 04:47 AM

not to sure flex. i think i had that error before, mostly because i didn't have windows media encoder 9 installed.

flexkill

12-09-2004, 05:10 AM

yup that was it killer!!!! :o ...anyway...here is first run...5522.... :(

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2706660

man ...why is my score so low!!!! :irk:...and c'mon guys, ad links please... :thumb:

Snafu

12-09-2004, 06:14 AM

Just some tips: remove as many services as possible get rid of any fancy screen savers, clean up your desktop (hide the icons), move any unused fonts into a separate folder so they don't load up.

Check out these threads here (http://www.bleedinedge.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2668&highlight=window+tweaks) and here (http://www.bleedinedge.com/forum/showthread.php?t=2720&highlight=windows). These were mainly for memstat but most should help with this bench.

Now I will have to find some time to try this bench out.

BTW why is your proc only at 3.5GHz? Where's that awesome oc?

flexkill

12-09-2004, 06:20 AM

i can run it at 240fsb but my scores in everything seem to drop :( ...also i can boot at 250fsb now...but thats about it!!! :( won't last long after post....also i have some questions about this mem...i think i'm not doing something right!!!! in the everest mem bench, my scores at 200fsb are smokin!!!! but when i start to over clock with mem still at 2-2-2-5 my latency scores and write scores go way down...and my read scores only increase a tiny bit!!!! that can't be right can it????...i'm also starting to doubt my ANTEC TB480w PSU...think i need more juice...what yall think...could be huh?????? :scratch:

Killer Munkey

12-10-2004, 12:20 PM

here's a link to my score, its a 100 points lower than my first score but who knows, don't really think this bench measures you cpu much except for multitasking and encoding/decoding purposes, of which the p4 alway beats a athlon.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2708625

hey flex, about your write and reads not improving with the increased fsb. perhaps the ram can operate at that speed but gives up errors? try relaxing the times a bit and see if that fixes makes both read and write go up.

flexkill

12-10-2004, 12:53 PM

hey flex, about your write and reads not improving with the increased fsb. perhaps the ram can operate at that speed but gives up errors? try relaxing the times a bit and see if that fixes makes both read and write go up.

i will try that..thanx killer... :beer:

WeldZilla

12-16-2004, 04:39 PM

Well I gave this a shot. My new mem picked up my score a bit. Not bad for a Canterwood stuck in this world of LGA'a and FX's.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v253/WeldZilla/record.jpg
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2703259
WZ

Snafu

12-16-2004, 05:28 PM

Not too bad he says :suspect: .

That's really good Weld :thumbs: .

Congrats

WeldZilla

12-16-2004, 07:22 PM

thanks Snafu. This Epox board, mem and cpu just seem to really get along well!

WZ

flexkill

12-16-2004, 07:34 PM

you smokin now Weld!!! :rock: :rock: :rock:

ReDoCeD

12-17-2004, 06:10 PM

Just made it in the hall of fame at 20th position
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2699119 :)

WeldZilla

12-17-2004, 06:21 PM

Heck of a score redoced. That is cooking right along!

WZ

Killer Munkey

12-17-2004, 06:22 PM

impressive

flexkill

12-17-2004, 11:33 PM

Just made it in the hall of fame at 20th position
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2699119 :)

good job bud!!! :thumbs: :beer:

ReDoCeD

12-19-2004, 03:37 AM

Thanks guys :thumbs:

eva2000

12-19-2004, 09:34 AM

my 4 month old score = 6,360 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2546894

should bench it again :D

dj_ski69

12-21-2004, 04:28 PM

I'm catching up with you guys....Look out.... :smash:
http://service.futuremark.com/servlet/Index?pageid=/orb/projectdetails&projectType=11&projectId=2720558

SkI

ReDoCeD

12-21-2004, 11:41 PM

wrong link dj_ski69 you have to publish it first then there will be a link there for you to use ;)

dj_ski69

12-22-2004, 04:35 AM

Hmmmm...
Sorry bout that....
I upgraded my CPU to a 560 J..."E0" stepping proc....
I immediately acheived a higher OC but Since the "ORB" is always behind on updating thier servers to Identify new CPUS, I , nor anybody else can publish a score made with an E0 stepping CPU....yet
FYI there are some people waiting to trounce the Hall o Fame iwth some pretty High Scores....Northwoods can't hang any longer
SkI

eva2000

12-29-2004, 06:00 PM

P4 3.4E 550 SL7J8 @ 17x245FSB = 4165mhz
Powercolor X800XT PE stock cooling @575/602
2x512MB OCZ PC3700EB Singles @245mhz 3-2-2-6 at 3.2v

PCMark04 = 6,526 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2736494)

http://fileshosts.com/DFI/875P_T/results/G4_MCP650_Thermochill120_3/3.4E_Q433A423/OCZ/PC3700EB/singles/2x512/245-245-3226-1.65-3.2-1.8-15.6-SCPC-FTM-120/pcmark04_575-602_6526_tn.jpg

eva2000

01-03-2005, 04:23 AM

Just a tad higher

PCmark04 = 6,605 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2743163)

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/875P_T/results/G4_MCP650_Thermochill120_3/3.4E_Q433A423/OCZ/PC3700EB/singles/2x512/1230_bios/245-245-3226-1.65-3.2-1.7-15.6-SCPC-FTM-120/pcmark04_616-602_6605_tn.jpg

Mickey4Paws

01-13-2005, 06:23 PM

Here's mine: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2760610

PCMark 04 = 5426

glorfy

01-13-2005, 10:12 PM

Not gonna post a score, because my scores suck :hide:, just a word of advice for SLI users. Running SLI cost me 10% at least on this bench. 4500 with SLI, 5000 in single card mode. I suppose I should do a side by side comparisson to see where I lose out - though it looks to be the 2D test....

1Avatar

01-13-2005, 11:00 PM

hehe ouch :( Time to pick up all the parts I've been putting off :smash:

http://www.telusplanet.net/public/franz/pcmark.JPG

Snafu

02-25-2005, 04:02 PM

glorfy

02-26-2005, 01:48 AM

Just started running PCMark04 to see what this will do in comparison.

5258 (http://service.futuremark.com/servlet/Index?pageid=/orb/projectdetails&projectType=11&projectId=2839000) with teh system in my sig except the card was not oc'd. Gonna try it with my little g-card and see if it helps the score any and maybe push up the FSB beyond normal stability.

Hmm, be interesting to see if O/Cing the vid card will help, I would bet no. In fact I've seen negative impact of O/Cing vid card B4 now! Let us know Snafu!

Snafu

02-26-2005, 06:11 AM

It helped but only a wee bit. I think this was because graphics is only one portion of the test.

The funny part is that after the first run with the card oc'd, it is reset to stock :irk: . After a second run with the card oc'd you get slightly higher scores. Of course running two benches without a clean boot between runs hurts the score too.

I have since pushed it to 5334 with some tricks but without pushing the FSB up I will not get any higher.

The proc is the issue <period>. 1 FSB over 235 and windows will not load <period>. I have been farting around with all kinds of setting to try and get windows to run but it always crashes on load. Testing included:
vcore up to 1.675
vagp up to 1.7
dram idle timer and refresh rates, infinite, 16T
dram idle timer 7.8, 15.6, 64T (I think auto too)
HT disabled (to confirm it helps and HT does help in this bench)
tried 5:4 no go
Can't recall all the setting I was playing with but still it will not go above 235 :irk:

C'est la vie

Snafu

02-26-2005, 06:36 AM

Edit: Interestingly at 240 I am able to run memtest without an error. WinXP screen pops up but only briefly before it reboots. I must be at the edge running 235.

Freddy

02-26-2005, 11:37 AM

My score: PCMark04 = 5951.

harleybro

02-26-2005, 02:44 PM

5517 Link in sig
3500+ @ 2.72 ATI 9800Pro

PS: just a suggestion. I am not sure if the person that created the topic can continue to edit the first post but.....I am on another forum and the first post is constantly edited w/ the scores and a ranking along w/ cpu and gpu info. ex Harleybro 5,517 3500+ @ 2.72 ATI 9800Pro It makes it neat and quick to search for people with comparible rigs.

Snafu

02-26-2005, 03:06 PM

Good suggestion harleybro :thumb:

Unfortuantely only a mod can edit the first post

Snafu

02-26-2005, 09:51 PM

5285 with new proc and card - no overclock and no tweaks (yet)

glorfy

02-27-2005, 02:32 AM

Hi Harleybro! The link in your siggie isn't valid - have you got a later one? Cheers!

harleybro

02-27-2005, 03:50 AM

Hi Glorify. Just checked and all the links seem to work fine. They where all done within the past few days. Maybe the site was down?

glorfy

02-27-2005, 05:10 AM

Hi again harleybro! Heres what I see - you have published it haven't you! :mischeif:

harleybro

02-27-2005, 05:57 AM

Published and here are shots from it.
http://img213.exs.cx/img213/2254/projects6rr.th.jpg (http://img213.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img213&image=projects6rr.jpg)
My video card wasn't what I thought I had it set at it was (460/810) :hide:
http://img213.exs.cx/img213/1677/details5aa.th.jpg (http://img213.exs.cx/my.php?loc=img213&image=details5aa.jpg)
Hope they work. :scratch:

glorfy

02-27-2005, 06:08 AM

Strange if I enter the link manually it works, but not from your siggie. Hang on.

Manual link.http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2832725

From your Siggie http://service.futuremark.com/servlet/Index?pageid=/orb/projectdetails&projectType=11&projectId=2832725

Yup! My link works - yours doesn't!! Edit your signature with the link as posted by me and it should be fine!

What I don't understand is why your virus scanning score absolutely kills mine - only thing I can think of, are you using SP1 still, I'm on SP2. Maybe I should unistall that POS!

harleybro

02-27-2005, 06:47 AM

Ok updated with a few more points:
5529
Hmmm just noticed if you OC w/ clockgen or ati Tool it doesn't show in the PCMark window. I was at 277X10 memory 1:1 and (470x810) on this one.
Yes have SP2 on.

glorfy

02-27-2005, 06:51 AM

So why is my Virus Scan so slow! :cry: 700 slower than yours, although everything else is similar - ish!

harleybro

03-20-2005, 10:48 AM

5651 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2876018 ) :fire:

Snafu

03-20-2005, 12:01 PM

5897 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2842638)

BB_One

03-21-2005, 11:11 AM

Just to get in this action.

BlindBat - NON SLI - 5640 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2878161)

CALIVI

04-03-2005, 10:57 PM

PCmark04 Score: 6128

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2898768

3.2E @ 4.09 / 255fsb 1:1
2x80Gb Raid0
Asus Ati 9550 :bonk:

jcarno

04-04-2005, 05:59 AM

here's an update........

Snafu

04-04-2005, 06:54 AM

PCmark04 Score: 6128 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2898768)
:yikes:
That is a great score and for a Prescott running over 4G's. Awesome.

What are you cooling with?

here's an update........
Fantastic score but sorry bud you need a valid link to a public score. Screen shots don't count.

boshuter

04-04-2005, 09:12 AM

Here is a screenshot of the last run I made a couple weeks ago. I didn't bother to publish it because it was only done at 265fsb X 15 (3.95ghz) and the system will bench much higher than that. This is using the 64bit 3.4es and Asus P5AD2 Premium board; I got rid of that board and have an Abit AA8XE now, I'll get it sorted out and get a better run to publish.

http://img163.exs.cx/img163/7761/04265x151bw.jpg

BTW; as others have pointed out, the best scores are with my video card at stock settings. Oc'ing the vc lowers the scores :(

This is on air cooling :thumbs:

jcarno

04-04-2005, 11:41 AM

sorry........i took the screenie before i published. But I swear it is legit. I'm not here to lie or cheat or decieve, If I was I would be claiming 4ghz club when i know It is not stable at that, just benchable.

Snafu

04-04-2005, 12:02 PM

Me bad :o I thought this was one of the sticky posts which require a link to the published score. No wrries here.

No, accusations on my part :thumb:

Now maybe Flexkill will get that a sticky started for this benchmark. Where are you Flexkill?

jcarno

04-04-2005, 12:44 PM

hmmmmmmm........maybe after a little tweeking that 64 bit will shine a little more.

jcarno

04-04-2005, 01:29 PM

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2899971 6285

boshuter

04-06-2005, 08:01 AM

I stuck my 3.8es in last night and ran this bench at all defaults on cpu and gpu and scored 6081.... not bad for no oc :thumbs:

Snafu

04-06-2005, 08:06 AM

:yikes:

Stunning is a better word for it. Over 6K with a stock system :rock:

Now I am very fearful what it would do when you get it cranked :thumb:

boshuter

04-06-2005, 08:23 PM

WOW... talk about feeling stupid :o I've had this cpu laying around for about 2 months or so and just stuck it in last night; I'm sitting here running Prime and have CPUZ and Uguru open to keep an eye on temps...... to make a long story short; I realized that this is a 64bit cpu, it's a model 571 :eek: I feel like it's xmas... I just happend to see the x86-64 under the instructions in CPUZ :thumbs:

boshuter

04-06-2005, 09:34 PM

Got my first score over 6500 :thumbs: Just ran a 6557 at the specs below

275fsb X 15 multi @ 4.12ghz
3:4 divider DDR732mhz 4-3-3-5

This thing looks good so far, can't wait to put it on water :D

glorfy

05-16-2005, 05:46 AM

Not going to extend the friendly competition/table to this benchmark Flexkill? It's a good one for our Intel buds to get there own back on AMD boys! :)

harleybro

05-16-2005, 06:39 AM

boshuter

05-16-2005, 06:52 AM

Not going to extend the friendly competition/table to this benchmark Flexkill? It's a good one for our Intel buds to get there own back on AMD boys! :)
Sounds good especially with the X2 being such a nice performer. ;)

LMAO.....I'd say it will make it to the list if the X2's do well in it ;)

harleybro

05-16-2005, 06:59 AM

boshuter

05-16-2005, 05:35 PM

Yeah... he got 8548 with his X2 4800+ :bow: and OPB got the WR with 7068 for a single AMD with his FX55.... both are awesome accomplishments :thumbs:

From the posts by Fugger and berkut it sounds like the dual core Intels will be about impossible to oc on air or ambient water :( berkut said it about killed his vapochill at 4.6ghz and his psu sounded like an arc welder... :yikes: :fire:

glorfy

05-16-2005, 07:40 PM

I know you've seen the thread Boshuter.. Just to summerize. Fugger O/Ced on his -104 triple cascade to 4.9Ghz - cpu alone was consuming 300w at this point :yikes:

PCMark04 was at 4668Mhz - linky (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2948854) (9020)

Now up to 9047@4817Mhz (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2948934)

BTW, saw a magazine review - 4Ghz on air was achieved

glorfy

05-28-2005, 04:15 AM

Well I'm really struggling with this bench - I've ran it 5 times in a row at 3263mhz, everythings fine, scoring around 6200 each time, but PCMark04 hangs each time I try to submit!! Even if I back off on the O/C. I've tried reinstalling PCMark04, with no luck! Oh well! Here's a picture instead!

EDIT! I think I've worked the problem out. I'll report back later.

glorfy

05-29-2005, 04:50 AM

Right - link to latest score
6241 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2974216)

What I need to know is, why is my Graphics memory 64 line score so low?

I've seen scores with the same gpu up around 3000. I've seen last generation gpus at higher than my gt! Whats going on!

Any help appreciated!

malinois1

05-29-2005, 05:00 AM

Here is a link to compare to mine http://service.futuremark.com/servlet/Index?pageid=/orb/projectdetails&projectType=11&projectId=2966726

Only think I see different is video drivers?

glorfy

05-29-2005, 05:03 AM

Comes up not valid? Which drivers Malinois1?

glorfy

05-29-2005, 05:07 AM

Your link should be this (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2966726) Malinois1.

I'll try some other drivers, but I'm not holding my breath!!

glorfy

05-29-2005, 05:36 AM

That worked! Cheers Malinois1!

New score - 6503 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2974279)
Which puts me eleventh for AMD single core cpus. That'll do for now!!

malinois1

05-29-2005, 12:26 PM

Glad it worked for you bud :beer:

Snafu

05-29-2005, 12:41 PM

That is a pretty good score for an AMD system as they usually don't fair as well as Intel in this bench (as you know ;))

nsanity

06-06-2005, 10:47 AM

Hey just ran this test :D

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm04=2984856

5050 at 3968mhz, is it just me or does this seem a bit low?? Any ideas??

Was below 5000 with vid card oc'ed and read about turning it back to stock and boke 5k.

Anyhoo :D ill keep messing about with settings and see how i do :)