View Full Version : POST YOUR 3DMark 2005 SCORES
flexkill
09-29-2004, 11:08 PM
i am still downloading it :irk: .... but i'd like to see what you guy's are getting so post away....... :thumb: :beer:
dj_ski69
09-30-2004, 01:02 AM
Heres my score.... Not a Bad try :)
The CPU score is nice.... :yup:
SKI
flexkill
09-30-2004, 01:38 AM
OMG :o my score is soooo bad!!!! i must be doing something wrong....i have seen other people with my card with scores with about 3200 or so!!!! what gives??? :beat: :bonk: :smash: :smash: :hide:
1503
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=26858
malinois1
09-30-2004, 03:48 AM
This is my score with rig in sig ;)
glorfy
09-30-2004, 04:07 AM
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=29041
ATI nuke Nvidia -
flexkill
09-30-2004, 04:25 AM
This is my score with rig in sig ;)
thats what i mean....what am i doing wrong??? :( why is my score soooo bad??? :hide:
malinois1
09-30-2004, 04:32 AM
Hey flex is the 5950 comparable to a 9800 pro ? also you are running a 5:4 Ratio that will make a difference also.
joeMan
09-30-2004, 04:37 AM
4795 First run, all defaults - no tweaking settings or OCing anything...
Don't really know how this stacks up yet...time will tell.
flexkill
09-30-2004, 05:38 AM
Hey flex is the 5950 comparable to a 9800 pro ? also you are running a 5:4 Ratio that will make a difference also.
ya but dude not that big a difference....plus i ran the bench 1:1 also no difference!!! also if you check the ORB, i saw a guy in there with same card stock settings and same cpu as mine clocked to only 3.2 and he got like over 4000????????? :irk: :scratch:
flexkill
09-30-2004, 05:48 AM
geez....people with 9600's are beating me :yikes: ...lol man something aint right :yikes: :hide:
Direfox
09-30-2004, 08:15 AM
At default settings....2413
Overclocked to 3.1....2439
3.1 AND video at 444, 399......2553 :irk:
And here I was so happy with my computer. And whats with those guys!? They must be French Mercenary Chefs!! I WANTED the dragon to get them, they were just out after another recipe. And was anyone else chanting "I DONT believe in Fairies, I DONT believe in Fairies" hoping that stupid 5 FPS green glow would drop dead? :beat: And dont EVEN get me started on the space thing......WHATS THE HECK IS AROUND THAT CORNER?!?!
Anyway, anyone know were I can pick up a new Radeon+ zx8250XT PLE (Pressed Latinum Edition) video card under $25,000? Im headed to the bank now to put a second mortgage on my house.
flexkill
09-30-2004, 08:48 AM
LMAO...i feal your pain :cry: :rotflmao:
ThugsRook
09-30-2004, 09:02 PM
im getting pretty much the same score as you Flex. i even tried it in 640res, didnt get much better :(
Schneider
09-30-2004, 10:12 PM
Its normal...any score above 2500=cheatin
The FX series doesn't do sumthin...slower pixel shaders or sumthin with DX9 so it ends up slower @ around 9600pro XT levels
hehe i get a score of 377 :D
flexkill
09-30-2004, 10:47 PM
rook what 's up man....this really sux!!! :irk: i have a 350$ 9600.... :( :cry:
jcarno
10-01-2004, 01:42 AM
mine
Snafu
10-02-2004, 06:26 PM
...people with 9600's are beating me...
Okay I gotta DL this so I can post the score for my 9600xt :D :lol:
250MB sound right? That's huge! I hope it makes me a coffee in the morning and tucks me in at night :yikes:
dbwillis
10-03-2004, 07:02 PM
Heres mine, just an OC on the CPU to 272fsb (5/4 for DDR)
www.ShinersInc.com/Pictures/ForumPics/272fsb_3dm2005.jpg
sierra_bound
10-04-2004, 08:06 AM
Used my backup system: SK8V/FX51
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=115319
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v38/ds7510/3DMark057405.jpg
Snafu
10-04-2004, 12:50 PM
Well it's downloaded using a connection at work. Took 4hours and 47 minutes with an average DL speed was 16.8 KB/s (excluding the 2.9MB patch). At least it is 3x faster than trying to DL at home :lol: .
Will have to install this week and post the stunning score for my 9600 :lol: .
Killer Munkey
10-04-2004, 01:11 PM
i only picked up 898points.
from what i've heard 3dmark05 is pretty much g card dependant, cpu and ram matter little
ReDoCeD
10-06-2004, 03:30 AM
Heres mine with a 9800 pro still waiting for xt :rolleyes:
No1 9800 pro with WHQL drivers (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=68486 )
BB_One
10-06-2004, 05:45 AM
Does anyone know why FM adds comments such at this one? And what does it take for them to approve the drivers?
Driver Status WHQL - Not FM Approved
sierra_bound
10-10-2004, 08:41 PM
Does anyone know why FM adds comments such at this one? And what does it take for them to approve the drivers?
Driver Status WHQL - Not FM Approved
Each driver goes through a review process to make sure there are no optimizations. Generally Futuremark will not give its total blessing until a driver has received WHQL approval. But FM has decided the 8.07 ATI driver can be used in 3DMark05 and the score will count, even though the project comparison sheet will show "Not FM Approved." If FM decides to give final approval to the 8.07 driver, all the scores will be taken down and people will have to bench again with the same driver. I know it's confusing, but that's the way FM works.
Snafu
10-10-2004, 09:00 PM
Got my score for my 9600xt running at 500/300. It is a whopping 1257.
Okay don't hit your head too hard from falling off your seat laughing too hard :irk:
BB_One
10-10-2004, 09:06 PM
Well at least your score is up there. Oppainter was holding world record at 8382, and I guess FM did not like it for they took his sheet down. :irk:
Goner she is: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=126503
Ok u could look at another bright side ..if I was to bench 3d05....lucky me if I'd hit 200... :rotflmao:
chefnr1
10-12-2004, 04:29 AM
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=157008
eva2000
10-12-2004, 05:03 AM
Done with Gecube 9800Pro Extreme @ 483/402
3dmark05 = 3,167
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=153295
http://www.fileshosts.com/AMD/DFI/6002_650/3400_2/Kingston/KHX3200/1x512/2/LDT_AUTO/10x/260-260-2226-1T-9-12-2211-1.66-3.54-1.5-1.7_DSlvl1_7x16x_3120/3dmark05_9800pro_483-402_3167_session.jpg
NeoShowtime
11-02-2004, 12:49 PM
2.6C at 260FSB (3384MHz) 2x512 PC3700 Gold rev3 2.5-3-3-6
Hercules 9800PRO 441core 372memory
2765
PCBuster
11-05-2004, 04:42 AM
i score 4450 in 3Dmark05 with the defult setting and with no OC, i saw in this thread similer machine score over 7000, what is my problem?
my box:
AMD64 FX53 Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939 Radeon X800XT PE
PQI Turbo 1024MB 2.2.2.5 WD Raptor x2 on RAID0
glorfy
11-05-2004, 04:56 AM
i score 4450 in 3Dmark05 with the defult setting and with no OC, i saw in this thread similer machine score over 7000, what is my problem?
my box:
AMD64 FX53 Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939 Radeon X800XT PE
PQI Turbo 1024MB 2.2.2.5 WD Raptor x2 on RAID0
It is low - you should be over 5000 I think. Are you using the latest catalyst drivers , as this will give you a big boost. Example on my 6800gt - 4600 old drivers 5600 new drivers.
7000 was with a v big O/Clock, unless you are packing dry ic/cascade cooling etc, your are not going to see that sort of score! - about 5500-6000 would be nice.
glorfy
11-05-2004, 05:07 AM
Pcbuster you are using the wrong drivers - they are for the 9000 series get catalyst 4.9+ from here (http://download.guru3d.com/ati/)
Snafu
11-05-2004, 05:51 AM
Going to try the 4.10 (ATi Radeon Catalyst 4.10 (CCC)) for my 9600xt. I think the last update I tried was 4.4 so hopefully this version I will see an improvement over my 1200 score :lol: .
Killer Munkey
11-05-2004, 08:34 AM
i use the 4.10 driver and i'm probably going to drop down to the 4.8 drivers cause the 4.10s don't run call of duty :( but they are otherwise stable
Pointhore
11-05-2004, 08:42 AM
Try the 8.07's ( you can get them at Guru3d.com) they work really nice and they have the memory fix in them. The 4.10's do not have the memory fix, hence the lower scores in 3Dmark.
Snafu
11-05-2004, 08:59 AM
Okay. I'm downloading the 8.07Beta (don't see a final version).
Any recommended cleaner that will go through the registry and clean every driver off? Driver Cleaner?
BTW is there any real difference between ATi Catalyst and ATi Radeon Catalyst? I have a Sapphire Radeon 9600XT (128MB) which I am told is the same as a ATI Radeon 9600XT.
Pointhore
11-05-2004, 09:04 AM
Use the ATI uninstall tool built into the driver folder. It works well. If you have driver cleaner you can run that also.
BTW is there any real difference between ATi Catalyst and ATi Radeon Catalyst? I have a Sapphire Radeon 9600XT (128MB) which I am told is the same as a ATI Radeon 9600XT.
Same :thumb:
PCBuster
11-05-2004, 06:33 PM
I've installed the 8.07BETA drivers, and here are my last scores:
System:
AMD64 FX53, Gigabyte K8NSNXP-939, Powercolor Radeon X800XT PE,
PQI Turbo Memory 1024MB 2.2.2.5, WD Raptor x2 on RAID0, SB Audigy2 ZS
Scores:
AquaMark3 - 74136
3DMark2001SE - 28305
3DMark03 - 12681
3DMark05 - 5896 :lol:
Now i have good start for OC. its a brand new rig, and i'll make him beg for marcy :fire:
thanks to averyone who help. :thumb:
SIK_L_CELL
11-17-2004, 04:04 PM
See sig! :fire:
PCBuster
11-17-2004, 10:43 PM
how did you rich 640\ 600 OC with your X800?
what kid of cooling do you use?
glorfy
11-18-2004, 12:12 AM
how did you rich 640\ 600 OC with your X800?
what kid of cooling do you use?
It says 'maze4' in his siggy!
SIK_L_CELL
11-18-2004, 03:40 AM
Vmods and good cooling is the trick. I actually bench at 672/630. :fire:
PCBuster
11-18-2004, 04:33 AM
I'm new in OC stuff... :o
What's Vmod?
SIK_L_CELL
11-18-2004, 04:39 AM
I'm new in OC stuff... :o
What's Vmod?
A very easy way to blow stuff up! :deviltail
A Vmod is a voltage modification. Usually more juice = higher clocks. :fire:
chefnr1
12-17-2004, 12:59 PM
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8308458
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3174300
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=157008
here is mine 3dmarks score:)
Gaspar
12-17-2004, 05:22 PM
Awake from the Dead am I :)
http://www.abxzone.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=14672
glorfy
12-26-2004, 08:25 PM
Here's mine - bit disappointed with it at the moment I was hoping for at least 10K - and if I can ever get the power issue to the second graphics card sorted, I'm sure I'll get it.
3DMark05 - 9443 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=416380)
SIK_L_CELL
12-26-2004, 08:43 PM
NIce, for two cards that is. :look: Really thats awesome. :deviltail
glorfy
12-26-2004, 10:00 PM
NIce, for two cards that is. :look: Really thats awesome. :deviltail
That IS with the core only at 370 - I should be able to get 15%-20% more on that if I sort out my power issue - and that's with sucky cooling! I tell ya, the top card is 10C hotter than the bottom one, I'd hate to have an SLI MB that hasn't got the extra space of the Asus :yikes: These babies need to either be water cooled, or exhaust the heat directly out of the case - but I'm flat broke after spending the money on 2X6800GT's :lol:
glorfy
12-27-2004, 04:23 AM
A Tweak - and still not 10K! Arrghh! I think the HSF has to come off and be replaced with something better and some AS5 - and some more volts - I think it was dropping back a bit/lot!
3DMark05 - 9889 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=417014)
eva2000
01-02-2005, 04:51 AM
Powercolor X800XT PE stock cooling @612/603 - 3Dmark05 = 6,926 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=438251)
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/875P_T/results/G4_MCP650_Thermochill120_3/3.4E_Q433A423/OCZ/PC3700EB/singles/2x512/1230_bios/248-248-3226-1.65-3.2-1.7-15.6-SCPC-FTM-120/3dmark/3dmark05_612-603_6926_tn.jpg
eva2000
01-03-2005, 04:24 AM
Just a tad higher
Powercolor X800XT PE @616/602
3dmark05 = 6,938 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=441584)
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/875P_T/results/G4_MCP650_Thermochill120_3/3.4E_Q433A423/OCZ/PC3700EB/singles/2x512/1230_bios/247-247-3226-1.65-3.2-1.7-15.6-SCPC-FTM-120/3dmark/3dmark05_616-602_6938_tn.jpg
eva2000
01-26-2005, 10:19 AM
2x XFX 6800GT PCI-E @405/1125
= 10,078
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=519813
http://fileshosts.com/AMD/Asus/A8NE_Deluxe/results/3500_90nm/OCZ/PC3700EB/2x512/232-232-3228-11-13-2322-1T-1.4-3/3dmark/3dmark05_405-1125_10078_tn.jpg
eva2000
01-26-2005, 05:13 PM
2x XFX 6800GT PCI-E @405/1150
= 10,219
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=521438
http://fileshosts.com/AMD/Asus/A8NE_Deluxe/results/3500_90nm/OCZ/PC3700EB/2x512/233-233-3228-10-13-2322-1T-1.4-3_156_16x_7x/3dmark/3dmark05_405-1150_10219_tn.jpg
scribz
01-27-2005, 11:56 PM
i got a score of 5093
Rig specs:
Giga-byte K8NS n-force 3
AMD 64bit 3000+ Winchester
1gb Corsair XMS pc3200 ddr400
eVGA 6800gt OC'd to 400/1100 using 71.20 Forceware
Thermaltake 480W 12v/18a
HiJon89
01-28-2005, 01:22 PM
6744 with X800 XT PE @ 625/576 with stock cooler, link in sig.
Rukee
01-28-2005, 05:51 PM
10,350
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=530645
HiJon89
01-30-2005, 01:36 PM
New high, finally broke 7K, link in sig. #1 P4 score with new build of 3DMark, #3 P4 score of all time. ALL ON AIR COOLING :rock:
eva2000
02-01-2005, 04:29 PM
3dmark05 = 10,803 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=541313)
http://fileshosts.com/AMD/Asus/A8NE_Deluxe/results/3500_90nm/OCZ/PC3700EB/2x512/LDT4x/246-246-3228-9-13-2222-1T-1.6-3.6psu-1.67/3dmark/6800U/3dmark05_455-1185_10803_tn.jpg
Rukee
02-03-2005, 09:22 AM
I wonder why your scores are not higher??
You CPU clock is greater then mine, your memory is tighter, you have Ultra cards with higher clocks, yet you just barely edge me out. You should be blowing me away.
Your link is not valid either.
eva2000
02-03-2005, 10:00 AM
3d2k05 isn't much cpu dependent, look at top 10 scores on ORB my 3500+ 90nm is only just behind FX-55 at same clock speeds
link isn't valid as i have a new one :)
3dmark05
2x eVGA 6800U PCI-E stock @455/1210 = 10,897 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=547904)
http://fileshosts.com/AMD/Asus/A8NE_Deluxe/results/3500_90nm/OCZ/PC3700EB/2x512/LDT3x/8x/339-247-3228-9-13-2222-1T-1.6-3-1.67/3dmark/3dmark05_455-1210_10897_tn.jpg
BB_One
02-03-2005, 06:06 PM
Nice to see you got your ASUS SLI working Eva, you are one of the lucky one it seems.
What mem are you running it with? TCCD or VX?
RyderOCZ
02-03-2005, 06:28 PM
You just keep getting that thing tweaked higher and higher....:thumbs: :rock:
eva2000
02-03-2005, 07:49 PM
thanks guys
BB_One, i'm using 2x 512MB OCZ PC3700EB as you can see in my compare urls i list all my components for easy reading :D
flexkill
02-04-2005, 11:55 AM
here is my first run of 05. OC on the card still stock on the CPU :)
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=552557
Android Vageta
02-04-2005, 02:04 PM
2209!! BEAT THAT BIOTCHES!!! :hide:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=552351
Stock 9700pro :cool: :bow:
zakee00
02-06-2005, 08:32 PM
5498 here
71.20 drivers, max IQ
joeMan
02-07-2005, 08:45 PM
http://home.comcast.net/~joehorning/3DM05.JPG
For PC1 in sig
flexkill
02-09-2005, 04:44 PM
you and me real close there joe...5812 :) http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=570039
eva2000
02-19-2005, 07:01 AM
up we go
3200+ 90nm 0445 VPMW cpu
DFI NF4 SLI-D 217 bios
2x eVGA 6800Ultra PCI-E @453/1215
2x 256MB KHX3200K2/512 BH-5 2-2-2-6
divider = 9:10 for 3d2k05
3dmark05
3200+ @ 302HTT/271mhz mem = 2718mhz
= 10,976 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=598105)
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/3200_0445_VPMW/Kingston/KHX3200K2/2x256/17_3/LDT3x/9x/302-271-2226-8-14-2212-1T-1.63-3.6-1.6_16x_7x/3dmark/3dmark05_453_1215_10976_tn.jpg
glorfy
02-23-2005, 06:18 AM
We're getting somewhere! 75.90 drivers. Using my hynix ram :(
10565 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=613867)
flexkill
02-23-2005, 06:39 AM
WOOT!!! broke 6,000 ...barely...but broke it!!!! :D ...not bad for a 3.0c and AGP card!!! :D http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=594429
Urlyin
02-23-2005, 08:02 AM
Here's the best my 3.2e on a 865p mobo can do with a X800 XT PE 3DMark05 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=602005)
Score= 6917
X800 PE@ 625/634
3.2e@4079mhz
P4P800-E Mobo
OCZ PC4000 2@256 1:1@291mhz FSB
Eva.... is there anyway we can get you to slow down so we can catch up ? LOL
Joeman .. if you oc'ed that rig you'd break 7000 without a sweat ...
CaTalyst.X
02-23-2005, 06:24 PM
System:
MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum
1GB PDP XBL TCCD 270X10 2.5-3-3-7 2.8V
Gigabyte X800XT 573/600 no vMods :D
3Dmark links in siggy :D
jeroen
02-24-2005, 06:13 PM
pay good attension this is not a 6800 gt or utlra no its a TRUE LE
3dmark03
jeroen
02-24-2005, 06:14 PM
pay good attension this is not a 6800 gt or utlra no its a TRUE LE 3dmark05
Kureboy99
02-26-2005, 11:14 AM
hmmm...for some reason I think mine should be higher... :scratch:
http://venus.walagata.com/w/kureboy99/3dmark_score.jpg
eva2000
02-26-2005, 01:58 PM
Here's the best my 3.2e on a 865p mobo can do with a X800 XT PE 3DMark05 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=602005)
Score= 6917
X800 PE@ 625/634
3.2e@4079mhz
P4P800-E Mobo
OCZ PC4000 2@256 1:1@291mhz FSB
Eva.... is there anyway we can get you to slow down so we can catch up ? LOL
Joeman .. if you oc'ed that rig you'd break 7000 without a sweat ...
haha, i'm still figuring out the ram/timings and stuff for my new boards PCI-E SLI/DFI NF4 SLI-D and X800XT PE/MSI K8N Neo2 ;)
harleybro
02-26-2005, 02:42 PM
3426 Link in sig
3500+ @ 2.72 ATI 9800Pro (490/790)
PS: just a suggestion. I am not sure if the person that created the topic can continue to edit the first post but.....I am on another forum and the first post is constantly edited w/ the scores and a ranking along w/ cpu and gpu info. ex Harleybro 3426 3500+ @ 2.72 ATI 9800Pro (490/790) It makes it neat and quick to search for people with comparible rigs.
Snafu
02-26-2005, 09:52 PM
4368 with new proc and card - no overclock and no tweaks yet.
I am surprised it is this low. Must have snafu'd the driver install :irk:
glorfy
02-27-2005, 02:16 AM
4368 with new proc and card - no overclock and no tweaks yet.
I am surprised it is this low. Must have snafu'd the driver install :irk:
Snafu with the new equip! :rock: You got 'The Beast' in then I see? You should be scoring higher than that bud. Latest drivers? If it was AMD I would be saying have you installed AGP driver, but Intel I have no clue! Expecting to see you rocking soon!
:wave:
flexkill
02-27-2005, 03:40 AM
3426 Link in sig
3500+ @ 2.72 ATI 9800Pro (490/790)
PS: just a suggestion. I am not sure if the person that created the topic can continue to edit the first post but.....I am on another forum and the first post is constantly edited w/ the scores and a ranking along w/ cpu and gpu info. ex Harleybro 3426 3500+ @ 2.72 ATI 9800Pro (490/790) It makes it neat and quick to search for people with comparible rigs.
we are working on a ranking system right now!!! :thumb:
Snafu
02-27-2005, 06:49 AM
Yeah I dumped in the 3.4C and x800 together last night. AMD and Intel are the same drivers. The drivers were from the CD. It was funny it seemed to keep looping through the install drivers. So I terminated it after about 3. Prolly too sleepy to realise what I was doing.
I need to get a good driver cleaner and reinstall the drivers. I have Catalyst 4.10 or ATI Catalyst drivers 8.07B. I think the later are the best but may not be the latest. I will have to go see.
Maybe Thugs can stop playing long enough to pipe in.
harleybro
02-27-2005, 06:53 AM
I think the newest should be 5.2 4.10 is 2004 October, 5.2 would be 2005 Feb. :thumb:
Blueball
02-28-2005, 06:35 AM
2622Mhz XP2500M
427/1210
I know I can break 6K .. I havn't tweaked it up yet :smash:
flexkill
02-28-2005, 06:36 AM
2622Mhz XP2500M
427/1210
I know I can break 6K .. I havn't tweaked it up yet :smash:
very nice :rock: :rock: :beer: what did you score on the CPU part of the test...if you ran it that is :scratch:
Blueball
02-28-2005, 07:23 AM
very nice :rock: :rock: :beer: what did you score on the CPU part of the test...if you ran it that is :scratch:
here it is ... Oh .. and BTW this one is at 5964 .... I'll bust 6K easy
Blueball
02-28-2005, 07:25 AM
pic2
flexkill
02-28-2005, 07:26 AM
damn man you gonna beat me and my 6800 ultra!!! very nice ...good job :beer:which drivers you using???
Blueball
02-28-2005, 07:28 AM
You're running on a 939 right?
I like my 2500M ALOT :beer:
flexkill
02-28-2005, 07:29 AM
You're running on a 939 right?
I like my 2500M ALOT :beer:
not yet, but will be soon!!!! :thumb:
THunDA
02-28-2005, 09:26 AM
This is with my settings in sig..
http://img208.exs.cx/img208/7337/untitled1copy4jh.jpg
:beer:
Blueball
02-28-2005, 01:28 PM
I'd say this score is great using my custom made GPU/DDR3 waterblock (http://www.bleedinedge.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7586) compared to 5K using the stock cooling.
Blueball
02-28-2005, 01:30 PM
I'd say this score is great using my custom made GPU/DDR3 waterblock (http://www.bleedinedge.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7586) compared to 5K using the stock cooling.
I'm gonna grab some dry ice this weekend and find my maximum :yikes:
Blueball
02-28-2005, 02:02 PM
Last attempt until dry ice ...
I seem to be limited now. Expert Tool only goes upto 420/1300 and Coolbits will only lets me go 449/1230
By using a combination of the two I tested with 449/1300
flexkill
02-28-2005, 02:06 PM
damn dude !!! saweet :thumb: :rock: :rock:
Blueball
02-28-2005, 05:18 PM
What are my options now?
Or am I correct, using both Expert Tool AND Coolbits to get the highest clock.
Can I increase the voltage to 1.6V with NibiTor since my load temps NEVER reach 50C?
Does anyone have a volt modified PNY bios to share?
flexkill
02-28-2005, 05:35 PM
have you tried using riva tuner to oc your card???? :scratch: i think riva tuner and Expert tool don't make nice together :(
Blueball
02-28-2005, 06:05 PM
have you tried using riva tuner to oc your card???? :scratch: i think riva tuner and Expert tool don't make nice together :(
Just tried it ... the max was 444/1250
I guess 6212 is my max for now ... until I do some bios and volt modding. Then I'll use chilled water and I bet I'll break 6,400
flexkill
02-28-2005, 06:19 PM
good luck man...awesome so far :yup: :rock: :rock: :beer:
GregP24
02-28-2005, 07:22 PM
I guess I'll throw my best every score in here.
This score was attained on old setup:
winnie 3200+@2.7ghz
2x512mb OCZ Plat Rev2@2.5-3-3-7(DDR540)
XT PE@560/590 using cat 5.2s with ait tray tool for OCing.
I'll probably vmod the XT tomorrow and see what I can get. I WANT 7k.
Blueball
02-28-2005, 07:50 PM
Very nice score ... I've seen PE's hit 7K ... so good luck
Urlyin
03-03-2005, 05:56 AM
Check out this top ten list here (http://xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=51594) for 3DMark05 SLI ... Eva2000 and Sik are in the top ten! :rock:
eva2000
03-03-2005, 06:26 AM
i'm just barely in amongst those FX-55@3+ ghz rigs with my 3200/3500+ winnies @ 2700mhz hehe
MickeyMouse
03-07-2005, 05:22 AM
8682
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=636168
flexkill
03-08-2005, 02:58 PM
woot got a good one now!!!! and still climbing!!!! :rock: 6,482 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=656611)
malinois1
03-11-2005, 08:40 AM
http://service.futuremark.com/servlet/Index?pageid=/orb/projectdetails&projectType=12&projectId=664899
5855
glorfy
03-12-2005, 04:17 AM
Hehe! New score! Using 76.10 drivers. Running 11*260 1:1, 1.5,2,2,5, GFX at 439/1158.
11112 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=667926)
harleybro
03-13-2005, 05:53 PM
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=673920 ( 6,566
harleybro
03-20-2005, 03:33 PM
6,648 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=695868)
joeMan
03-20-2005, 10:21 PM
5,965 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=696638)
First run, all stock. Same as my AGP 8X X800XT PE score. I thought would be better being as it's PCIe... :scratch:
BB_One
03-21-2005, 10:49 AM
Initial run just to get in this action. Seems SLi will be hard to catch in 2003 and 2005 !
BlindBat - NON SLI - 6165 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=698070)
BB_One
03-21-2005, 10:52 AM
http://service.futuremark.com/servlet/Index?pageid=/orb/projectdetails&projectType=12&projectId=664899
5855
Project not valid it says. Published?
joeMan
03-24-2005, 02:14 AM
6,304 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=705559)
~ x850XT PCIe @ 550/575; +10MHz over PE GPU speed, need to get GDDR +15MHz more to match PE.
~ FX-55 @ 2.73GHz ~ 1.53v
~ TwinX2048 @ 3-4-4-10 1T ~ 2.9v
Finally some stable OCing with this TWINX2048...
Not huge, but a lot of fun for me.
I could unleash my wrath with better cooling/better RAM and a little help from my friends.
joeMan
03-24-2005, 02:55 PM
6,471 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=707246)
5.3's
561/591
210x13 2.73GHz
my best yet...
eva2000
03-26-2005, 01:02 AM
Hehe! New score! Using 76.10 drivers. Running 11*260 1:1, 1.5,2,2,5, GFX at 439/1158.
11112 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=667926)
my latest
3dmark05 = 11,185 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=711911)
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/3500_CAA2C_0505_APMW/OCZ/PC3500PlatLE/LDT3x/255-255-2226-8-15-2212-1T-1.6-3.6-1.8-1.4_DS7_DDS4_iSkew255/3dmark/3dmark05_455-1215_11185_tn.jpg
eva2000
03-26-2005, 03:34 AM
higher = 11,194
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=712321
http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SLI_D/results/3500_CAA2C_0505_APMW/Kingston/KHX3200K2/17_3/LDT3x/9x/306-275-2226-7-15-2212-1T-1.62-3.7-1.6-1.5_DS7_DDS4_3120/3dmark/3dmark05_455-1215_11194_tn.jpg
harleybro
04-01-2005, 06:45 PM
6,842 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=732511 )
joeMan
04-08-2005, 02:33 AM
6,609 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=750236)
Best yet for me.
Kev_Dawg
04-08-2005, 04:19 AM
What things are you guys selecting for the program to run the tests tell me and I'll get my score also
boshuter
04-08-2005, 06:49 AM
Initial run just to get in this action. Seems SLi will be hard to catch in 2003 and 2005 !
BlindBat - NON SLI - 6165 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=698070)
There are 2 ways to look at the SLI scores...... you can just ignore them; or run the bench twice and add your scores up :lol:
I do wish the scores on the front page were marked SLI or non-SLI
Snafu
04-08-2005, 07:40 AM
Has the first post been updated?
harleybro
04-10-2005, 06:27 PM
First time breaking 7K :D
7,029 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=759882)
harleybro
04-11-2005, 05:45 PM
7,447 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=762258 )
Hey flex why not a sticky05? :thumb:
flexkill
04-11-2005, 05:47 PM
ya ...i was thinking that too :scratch: but if i do, it will be a new official thread...and you guys will have to post there...is that cool with you guys???? :)
Boy, I didnt do very good my first run! :(
3DMark05 Score (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=783549)
gijoe
04-23-2005, 02:50 AM
Initial run just to get in this action. Seems SLi will be hard to catch in 2003 and 2005 !
BlindBat - NON SLI - 6165 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=698070)
There are 2 ways to look at the SLI scores...... you can just ignore them; or run the bench twice and add your scores up :lol:
I do wish the scores on the front page were marked SLI or non-SLI
round 9000 for 05 and 15000 for 03
i am a bit disappointed when you compare to other sli scores :(
I did 14000 with my old board in 03 with a x800xt
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.8 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.