PDA

View Full Version : Gigacube 9600PRO/9600PRO VIVO


eva2000
07-13-2003, 10:16 AM
Bloody awesome core speeds on this cards!

http://www.fileshosts.com/ati/gigacube/9600proANDvivo/9600pros_004_thumb.jpg (http://www.fileshosts.com/ati/gigacube/9600proANDvivo/9600pros_004.JPG)

2.8C / Albatron PX865PE PRO2
2x 256MB GEIL PC3700 Golden Dragon @233mhz 2.5-3-3-7 at 2.8v

using Rage3d 3.8c

128MB Gigacube 9600PRO VIVO (memory chips = samsung 322 3.3ns)
stock speeds = 398.25/297
best core oc = 515.25 (537.75mhz froze half way into car chase test)
best mem oc = 339.75
best 3dmark2001se passable = 515.25/339.75
best 3dmark2003 passable = coming soon

2.4C / IC7
2x 256MB OCZ PC3700 Gold @233mhz 2-3-3-7 at 2.85v

using Rage3d 3.8c

128MB Gigacube 9600PRO (non-vivo) (memory chips = samsung 319 3.3ns)
stock speeds = 398.3mhz/297
best core oc = 474.5mhz
best mem oc = 364.5mhz
best 3dmark2001se passable = 481.5mhz/364.5mhz
best 3dmark2003 passable = 474.5mhz/360mhz
eva2000
07-13-2003, 10:16 AM
reserved for benchmarks

9600PRO VIVO@515.25/339.75

3dmark2001se

http://www.fileshosts.com/pentium4/D1/albatron/benchmarks2/2.8C/geil/pc3700gd/233-233-2337-ehon/rage3d/3dmark2001-515.25-339.75.jpg

http://www.fileshosts.com/pentium4/D1/albatron/benchmarks2/2.8C/geil/pc3700gd/233-233-2337-ehon/rage3d/rage3d-515.25-339.75.jpg
Chuck232
07-13-2003, 05:02 PM
Yeah, being built on the .13u process and a relatively small transistor count, many people are getting insane core overclocks with stock cooling! :eek:

Unfortunately many people have been seeing it only get the same performance as a R9500 Pro at stock with the R9600 Pro full overclocked though...:(
eva2000
07-15-2003, 03:11 AM
Originally posted by Chuck232
Yeah, being built on the .13u process and a relatively small transistor count, many people are getting insane core overclocks with stock cooling! :eek:

Unfortunately many people have been seeing it only get the same performance as a R9500 Pro at stock with the R9600 Pro full overclocked though...:( yeah but i don't mind.. running alot cooler these do :)
eva2000
08-03-2003, 06:12 AM
Wow after testing both cards, the overclocks on these 2 cards differs alot! One can oc the core very high and the other can oc' memory higher

speeds according rage3d 3.8c
----------------------------------------------
128MB Gigacube 9600PRO VIVO
Samsung 322 3.3ns ram

Default
core: 398.3mhz
mem: 297 x 2

Stable 3Dmark2001SE overclock ~ 14,311
core: 515.25mhz
mem: 339.75mhz x 2

Stable 3Dmark2003 overclock ~ 4132 marks
core: 501.25mhz
mem: 335.5mhz x 2

----------------------------------------------
128MB Gigacube 9600PRO non-VIVO
Samsung 319 3.3ns ram

Default
core: 398.25mhz
mem: 297 x 2

Stable 3Dmark2001SE overclock ~ 14,312
core: 481.5mhz
mem: 364.5mhz x 2

Stable 3Dmark2003 overclock ~ 4157 marks
core: 474.5mhz
mem: 360mhz x 2

----------------------------------------------


128MB Gigacube 9600PRO non-VIVO
3dmark2001se @477/720: 14,312 (http://www.fileshosts.com/pentium4/D1/abit/ic7/memory/corsair/xms3500c2/2x512/272-218-2336-auto-vcacheoff/3dmark2001-477-360.jpg)
3dmark2003 @477/720: 4,157 (http://www.fileshosts.com/pentium4/D1/abit/ic7/memory/corsair/xms3500c2/2x512/272-218-2336-auto-vcacheoff/3dmark2003-477-360.jpg)

128MB Gigacube 9600PRO VIVO
3dmark2001se @515/678 = 14,311 (http://www.fileshosts.com/pentium4/D1/albatron/benchmarks2/2.8C/geil/pc3700gd/233-233-2337-ehon/rage3d/3dmark2001-515.25-339.75_rage3d.jpg)
3dmark2003 @501/670: 4,132 (http://www.fileshosts.com/pentium4/D1/albatron/benchmarks2/2.8C/geil/pc3700gd/233-233-2337-ehon/rage3d/3dmark2003-501.25-335.25_rage3d.jpg)