Tony
04-12-2004, 08:52 AM
Just a quick dirty test using EB 3500 to show why AMD should move now to ddr500/250fsb on the cpu.I tested with the AK89 max from AOpen with a 9800pro at stock speed with LDT set at 3 for 200x10 and 2.5 for 250x8.
Memory timings are 2.5-3-2-9 at 200fsb and 3-3-2-9 at 250fsb..final CPU clock speed is the same.
CPU-Z
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ad.leach/AK89%20max/cpuz200.JPG
3Dmark
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ad.leach/AK89%20max/200x10-2.5-3-2-9.JPG
Now to 250fsb ;)
CPU-Z
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ad.leach/AK89%20max/cpuz250.JPG
3Dmark
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ad.leach/AK89%20max/250x8-3-2-3-9.JPG
Well there you have it...simple move to 250fsb gains some nice speed and well worth the effort.No final difference in final CPU clock speed...just a faster bus speed.
Memory timings are 2.5-3-2-9 at 200fsb and 3-3-2-9 at 250fsb..final CPU clock speed is the same.
CPU-Z
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ad.leach/AK89%20max/cpuz200.JPG
3Dmark
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ad.leach/AK89%20max/200x10-2.5-3-2-9.JPG
Now to 250fsb ;)
CPU-Z
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ad.leach/AK89%20max/cpuz250.JPG
3Dmark
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ad.leach/AK89%20max/250x8-3-2-3-9.JPG
Well there you have it...simple move to 250fsb gains some nice speed and well worth the effort.No final difference in final CPU clock speed...just a faster bus speed.